VS

Home > Snowboard Bindings > Comparison

Compare Flow The Five Snowboard Bindings 2013 VS Rome United Snowboard Bindings
 
 
Add another Item to this comparison  Add Item

Overview:

There are 21 differences and 7 similarities between Flow The Five Snowboard Bindings 2013, Rome United Snowboard Bindings
 
Specifications
Product ID   
280,856
vs   235,787
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Product ID”

Skill Range   Advancedintermediate-expert vs   Intermediate-advanced  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Skill Range”

Additional Details   Combi Mounting-disk For 4x4 And 3hp vs   Quicklock Forward Lean: Tool-free Forward Lean  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Additional Details”

Flex   Medium vs   Soft  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Flex”

Toe Strap Style   None vs   Convertible  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Toe Strap Style”

Quick Entry   Yes vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quick Entry”

Canted Footbed   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Canted Footbed”

ICS Channel Compatible   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “ICS Channel Compatible”

Traditional Burton (3D) Compatible   Yes vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Traditional Burton (3D) Compatible”

Standard 4 Hole Compatible   Yes vs   Yes  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Standard 4 Hole Compatible”

Buckles   Aluminum vs   Aluminum  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Buckles”

HighBack   Single Component vs   United Asym  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “HighBack”

Chassis Material   Plastic vs   Aluminum  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Chassis Material”

Strap Material   Unifit Powerstrap vs   Eva  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Strap Material”

Add Comment about “Specifications

cancel
Description
Description 1   H-series Molded Baseplate: Engineered With A Wider Platform For Stability And Ease Of Entry And Exit With Adjustable Toe Ramps For Dialing In A Perfect Fit vs   Contour Ankle Strap: Cush, Mid-level Support For Higher Levels Of Tweak  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 1”

Description 2   Uniback Ventilated Hiback vs   Conformist.1 Toe Strap - Super Conforming Eva For The Best-fitting, Lowest Profile Toe Strap In Snowboarding  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 2”

Description 3   I-fusion Powerstrap With Lsr-buckles vs   Subbase Pad - Takes The Edge Off Hard Landings And Reduces Vibration  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 3”

Description 4   Toolless Fwd-lean Adjustment vs   Highback Rotation: O To 12 Degrees Of Rotation Places Power Where You Like It  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 4”

Description 5   Combi Mounting-disk For 4x4 And 3hp vs   9times Ankle Strap Positioning: You Decide How Much Ankle Support You Want  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 5”

Description 6    vs   Adjustable Toe Ramp: Customized In The Toe Area For Pressuring Up The Toe Edge  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 6”

Description 7    vs   Quickstrap.2 Technology: Tool-free Strap Length Adjustment  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 7”

Description 8    vs   Quicklock Forward Lean: Tool-free Forward Lean  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Description 8”

Add Comment about “Description

cancel
General
Brand   Flow vs   Rome  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Brand”

Gender   Mens vs   Mens  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Gender”

Model Year   
2013
vs   2012
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Model Year”

recommended use   All-mountain vs   All-mountain Freestyle  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “recommended use”

Skill Level   Advanced Intermediate vs   Intermediate  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Skill Level”

warranty   One Year vs   One Year  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “warranty”

Add Comment about “General

cancel

Compare Flow The Five Snowboard Bindings 2013 vs Rome United Snowboard Bindings 2012 Snowboard Bindings


Scroll To Top

saved